APA
Click to copy
Berry, A. B. L., Lim, C. Y., Hirsch, T., Hartzler, A., Kiel, L. M., Bermet, Z. A., & Ralston, J. (2019). Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and their Providers. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Berry, Andrew B. L., Catherine Y. Lim, Tad Hirsch, A. Hartzler, Linda M. Kiel, Zoë A. Bermet, and J. Ralston. “Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and Their Providers.” International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019).
MLA
Click to copy
Berry, Andrew B. L., et al. “Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and Their Providers.” International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2019.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{andrew2019a,
title = {Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and their Providers},
year = {2019},
journal = {International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
author = {Berry, Andrew B. L. and Lim, Catherine Y. and Hirsch, Tad and Hartzler, A. and Kiel, Linda M. and Bermet, Zoë A. and Ralston, J.}
}
People with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) often disagree with healthcare providers on priorities for care, leading to worse health outcomes. To align priorities, there is a need to support patient-provider communication about what patients consider important for their well-being and health (i.e., their personal values). To address barriers to communication about values, we conducted a two-part study with key stakeholders in MCC care: patients, informal caregivers, and providers. In Part I, co-design activities generated seven dimensions that characterize stakeholders' diverse ideas for supporting communication about values: explicitness, effort, disclosure, guidance, intimacy, scale, and synchrony. In Part II, we used the dimensions to generate three design concepts and presented them in focus groups to further scrutinize findings from Part I. Based on these findings we outline directions for research and design to improve patient-provider communication about patients' personal values.