Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and their Providers


Journal article


Andrew B. L. Berry, Catherine Y. Lim, Tad Hirsch, A. Hartzler, Linda M. Kiel, Zoë A. Bermet, J. Ralston
International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2019

Semantic Scholar DBLP DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Berry, A. B. L., Lim, C. Y., Hirsch, T., Hartzler, A., Kiel, L. M., Bermet, Z. A., & Ralston, J. (2019). Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and their Providers. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Berry, Andrew B. L., Catherine Y. Lim, Tad Hirsch, A. Hartzler, Linda M. Kiel, Zoë A. Bermet, and J. Ralston. “Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and Their Providers.” International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019).


MLA   Click to copy
Berry, Andrew B. L., et al. “Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and Their Providers.” International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2019.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{andrew2019a,
  title = {Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and their Providers},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
  author = {Berry, Andrew B. L. and Lim, Catherine Y. and Hirsch, Tad and Hartzler, A. and Kiel, Linda M. and Bermet, Zoë A. and Ralston, J.}
}

Abstract

People with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) often disagree with healthcare providers on priorities for care, leading to worse health outcomes. To align priorities, there is a need to support patient-provider communication about what patients consider important for their well-being and health (i.e., their personal values). To address barriers to communication about values, we conducted a two-part study with key stakeholders in MCC care: patients, informal caregivers, and providers. In Part I, co-design activities generated seven dimensions that characterize stakeholders' diverse ideas for supporting communication about values: explicitness, effort, disclosure, guidance, intimacy, scale, and synchrony. In Part II, we used the dimensions to generate three design concepts and presented them in focus groups to further scrutinize findings from Part I. Based on these findings we outline directions for research and design to improve patient-provider communication about patients' personal values.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in